RANJIT SINGH
Anil Sabharwal – Appellant
Versus
Arun Sabharwal – Respondent
1. This order will dispose of two Civil Revision Nos. 1805 of 2007 (Anil Sabharwal v. Arun Sabharwal) and 1806 of 2007 (Sunil Sabharwal v. Arun Sabhawal). The facts are being taken from Civil Revision No. 1805 of 2007.
2. Petitioners and respondents, a closely related business family, are contesting a suit which arises out of the Memorandum of Understanding/Family Settlement giving rise to subsequent disputes and differences between them. Respondents Arun Sabharwal and others filed a suit in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Patiala for declaration that Memorandum of Understanding/Family Settlement entered in between the petitioners and respondents No. 1 and 2 a legal, valid, binding between the parties and further for rendition of accounts in regard to the profits made by defendants-petitioners by sale of products in the area of the respondents under the Trademark of Kesh Nikhar etc. and for payment of damages on account thereof. When served with the notice, the petitioners filed application dated 1-2-2007 for rejection of the plaint. Plea is that the petitioners are not residing within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court at Patiala and there is no cause of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.