SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 12

RAJIVE BHALLA
Preeti – Appellant
Versus
Manmohan Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Rajive Bhalla, J.

1. The petitioner-tenant, has filed this petition, under Section 15(5)A of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), impugning the order of ejectment passed by the Rent Controller, Hoshiarpur, as also the order of dismissal of her appeal, passed by the Appellate Authority, Hoshiarpur.

2. The petitioner, admittedly, was inducted as a tenant in the demised premises in 1994 by Sh. Satvir, who filed an ejectment petition dated 4.10.1996, praying for the petitioners ejectment for non payment of rent. During the pendency of this petition, Satvir passed away on 15.12.1998. The respondents Manmohan Singh and Madan Mohan sons of Mehnga Singh, alleging that they had inherited ownership of the demised premises, filed an application for their being impleaded as legal representatives. The said application was allowed vide order dated 2.12.1999 and the respondents were impleaded as petitioners. The Rent Controller, vide order dated 21.12.1999, held the rate of rent to be Rs. 450/- per month and in addition, held that the tenant was required to pay water charges @ Rs. 15/- per month and sewerage charges @ Rs. 5/- per month. As the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top