VIJENDER JAIN, MAHESH GROVER
Sudhir Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
Vijender Jain, J.
1. This judgment will dispose of the above mentioned two writ petitions as they involve common questions of law and facts.
2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the notifications dated 11.10.2002 and 10.6.2003 issued by the Financial Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Haryana, Labour and Employment Department, whereby the minimum wages as payable to the workers under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (for short, `the Act) have been revised/enhanced and made applicable with effect from 11.10.2002.
3. By virtue of notification dated 11.10.2002, the State government proposed to enhance the minimum wages as per the schedule attached with it and invited objections from the persons likely to be affected within a period of two months from the date of its issue.
4. After considering the objections so received, notification dated 10.6.2003 was issued and the rates of minimum wages to be paid to the workers were enhanced and made applicable with effect from the aforementioned date.
Both these notifications have been attached as Annexures P2 and P4 with C.W.P. No. 10092 of 2003, whereas the same are annexed as Annexures P4 and P6 with C.W.P. No. 15849 of 2003,
The ess
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.