SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 2158

VIJENDER JAIN, MAHESH GROVER
Sudhir Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Vijender Jain, J.

1. This judgment will dispose of the above mentioned two writ petitions as they involve common questions of law and facts.

2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the notifications dated 11.10.2002 and 10.6.2003 issued by the Financial Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Haryana, Labour and Employment Department, whereby the minimum wages as payable to the workers under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (for short, `the Act) have been revised/enhanced and made applicable with effect from 11.10.2002.

3. By virtue of notification dated 11.10.2002, the State government proposed to enhance the minimum wages as per the schedule attached with it and invited objections from the persons likely to be affected within a period of two months from the date of its issue.

4. After considering the objections so received, notification dated 10.6.2003 was issued and the rates of minimum wages to be paid to the workers were enhanced and made applicable with effect from the aforementioned date.

Both these notifications have been attached as Annexures P2 and P4 with C.W.P. No. 10092 of 2003, whereas the same are annexed as Annexures P4 and P6 with C.W.P. No. 15849 of 2003,

The ess





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top