SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 2089

RANJIT SINGH
Nachhatro – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Ranjit Singh, J.

1. Another case under the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act), which apparently is not properly investigated, leading to the result that is to follow. In far too many cases, it is noticed that the police resort to very casual investigations into such serious cases as a result of which undue benefits accrue to the persons accused of serious offences under the Act. There may be a need to streamline and regulate the manner or mode of investigation. It is noticeable that generally similar or identical pleas are raised in various cases for acquittal in such cases. In majority of the cases, the plea of conscious possession or violation of statutory or mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act are raised. It is not understood as to why the police would not follow such provisions or otherwise properly investigate the source of contraband so that aspect of possession or the accused being in conscious possession, is properly investigated. There is a need for some comprehensive directive to ensure meaningful and proper investigation. Leaving this aside, let us notice the facts in the present case which are as under :-

ASI Jaswinder Singh, (PW2) while











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top