SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 2096

M.M.S.BEDI
Pardeep Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

M.M.S.Bedi, J.

1. This order will dispose of a bunch of 13 petitions as the common question of law and facts arise in the all the said petitions.

2. Apprehending threat to their life and liberty at the hands of the State authorities i.e. Police on the instance of their family members, a large number of young couples have approached this Court for a direction to the respondents that interference in their married life may be prohibited, taking the shelter of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Pendency of about 40 petitions for motion hearing by young couples on the cause list of this Court today is indicative of the fact that there has been remarkable change in the last few decades revolutionizing the entire outlook by bringing radical changes in the attitude and approach of the society towards various social practices, calling upon the Courts to consider the scope of the right of life and liberty invoked by the young couples of `run away marriages or `rebellion marriages performed against the wishes of the other members of the society i.e. their parents. The common features of all the above said petitions are as follows :

(i) the petitioners claim themselves to be majo
































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top