SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 1994

SHAM SUNDER
Gurdeep Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Tarsem Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Sham Sunder, J.

1. This judgment shall dispose of the aforesaid two appeals, arising out of the common award dated 7.10.1992, rendered by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Karnal, whereby the Claim Petition No. 27 of 1989/103 of 1992 was partly allowed and compensation, in the sum of Rs. 25,000, with interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum from the date of filing the same was granted whereas Claim Petition No. 26 of 1989/104 of 1992 was dismissed.

2. The facts of Claim Petition No. 27 of 1989/103 of 1992 are that on 2.5.1989, the claimant No. 3, namely, Vikram Singh, was driving tractor No. HYM 651, attached with trolley loaded with wheat and was going from Ambala towards Nilokheri for unloading the same at the Nilokheri Grain Market and when he reached near Nilokheri, a signal was given for turning the tractor towards the right hand side of the road. The tractor had crossed the road and reached the unmetalled portion of the road when the bus No. DEP 9640, being driven rashly and negligently by Tarsem Singh, respondent No. 1, came from the opposite direction, i.e., from the side of Karnal and hit the tractor-trolley in the middle, as a result whereof, the hook of t


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top