SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 2026

RANJIT SINGH
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Ranjit Singh, J.

1. Through this order, four appeals bearing Criminal Appeal Nos. 452 SB of 2007 (Krishan v. State of Haryana), 500 SB of 2007 (Davender v. State of Haryana), 886 SB of 2007 (Sunil Kumar v. State of Haryana) and 968 SB of 2007 (Sombir v. State of Haryana) are being disposed of as they arise out of a common judgment, leading to conviction of four different appellants.

2. The appellant in each case is accused of offences under Sections 395, 397, 506 IPC. In addition, appellant Surender @ Baba is also accused of an offence under Section 25 of the Arms Act. They all stand convicted for the respective offences alleged against them and sentenced to suffer RI for 10 years coupled with fine of Rs. 5,000/- in each case. They have filed the above noted separate appeals before this Court. It may also need a notice that except for appellant, Sunil, rest of the appellants have been ordered to be released on bail. These appeals, though of the year 2007, were set down for hearing, while declining the prayer for bail made by appellant, Sunil.

3. The appellants are accused of having committed a dacoity at farm house of one Satdev Tyagi on 30.6.2003, which is situated on Murt









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top