SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 1800

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Pritam Dev Sood – Appellant
Versus
Kewal Krishan Puri – Respondent


Judgment

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J.

1. This judgment shall dispose of six Civil revision petitions bearing Nos.211 to 216/1988, which are arising from the common judgment, whereby six appeals filed by petitioner Pritam Dev Sood against six separate orders of the Prescribed Authority under the payment of Wages Act, 1936 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) have been dismissed by the Appellate Authority.

2. Petitioner Pritam Dev Sood claiming himself to be the employee of M/s Puri brothers, Bahadurgarh, filed six different applications before the Prescribed Authority under Sec.15 (2) of the Act for recovery of his salary for different periods from April 5, 1981 to June, 1985. He claimed his salary at the rate of Rs.930.00 per month.

3. In the applications, it was stated by the petitioner that when he was posted at bahadurgarh, on March 25, 1981, while on duty, he met with an accident in Delhi. He remained hospitalised till April 4, 1981. Thereafter, Shri Kewal Krishan Puri, the managing Partner of Puri Brothers offered him to shift to a branch of the firm at Moga, where he was to get the consolidated salary of Rs.930.00 per month. The petitioner submitted that thereafter, he shifted to M











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top