SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 461

VINOD K.SHARMA
Puran – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Vinod K.Sharma, J.

1. Present appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Karnal reversing the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court.

2. The plaintiff-appellants had claimed a decree for permanent injunction against the State claiming themselves to be the owners in possession as co-sharers of land measuring 12 kanals. It was further claimed that the plaintiff-appellants were in peaceful and continuous possession of the suit land for the last 30 years and further Khasra Girdawari entries since 1990 are in their favour.

3. Learned lower appellate Court has recorded a positive finding of fact that the land belongs to the State and the claim of the appellants that they were in possession could not be accepted merely on the basis of three stray entries in the Khasra Girdawari which were not incorporated in the Jamabandis. No Jamabandi showing the possession of the appellants was placed on record. Furthermore, the nature of the land recorded in Jamabandi was gair mumkin nadi. In view of this, learned lower appellate Court has reversed the finding recorded by the learned trial Court which was based merely o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top