SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 294

VINOD K.SHARMA
Bahadur Singh – Appellant
Versus
Avtar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Vinod K.Sharma, J.

1. By way of present revision petition, the petitioner have challenged the order dated 22.3.2006 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Malerkotla, vide which the application moved by the petitioners under Order 1 Rule 10 and Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been dismissed.

2. The plaintiff-petitioners filed a suit for specific performance of agreement to sell dated 19.12.2002. Along with the suit an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 21 of C.P.C. was also filed in which the respondent was restrained from alienating the suit land in any manner. In the said suit, Sarvshri Jasbir Singh and Jagdeep Singh, sons of Mohinder Singh, had moved an application dated i 1.12.2003 under Order 1 Rule 10 of the C.P.C. for being impleaded as a party on the plea that the there was an agreement to sell dated 7th December 2002 qua the suit land in their favour which was executed by Avtar Singh defendant. The plaintiff-petitioners contested the said application on the ground that the remedy of Jasbir Singh and Jagdeep Singh was to file a separate suit on the basis of alleged agreement of sale. The said appl
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top