SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 198

RAJESH BINDAL, M.M.KUMAR
Ratti Woollen Mills – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

M.M.Kumar, J.

1. The prayer made in this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution is for issuance of direction to the respondents to release the payment of Rs. 5,50,000 deposited by the petitioner at the time of filing appeal as a condition precedent before the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner-firm is engaged in the manufacture of yam. While framing assessment for the year 1992-93, the Assessing Authority created additional demand of Rs. 33,52,234 while rejecting R.D. sales made to two firms, namely, Shiv Shakti Yarn and Indian Woll Agency, vide order dated March 31, 2000.

3. As a pre-condition for entertainment of appeal against the order creating additional demand, the petitioner deposited a sum of Rs. 5,50,000 on September 6, 2005. Ultimately, the order of assessment was set aside by the VAT Tribunal and the matter was remitted back to the Assessing Authority to pass fresh order in accordance with law, vide order dated July 11, 2006. After the remand by the VAT Tribunal, the matter has not been decided by the Assessing Authority in spite of requests made by the petitioner. Thereafter











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top