SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 209

HEMANT GUPTA, MOHINDER PAL
Sumangal Roy – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

Hemant Gupta, J.

1. This order shall dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos. 10319-CAT of 2001; CWP No. 10852-CAT of 2001; CWP No. 11024-CAT of 2001; 11039-CAT of 2001; CWP No. 10320-CAT of 2001; CWP No. 10286 of 2001 and CWP No. 11978-CAT of 2004 filed by the 9 lecturers appointed on adhoc basis in the Government College of Arts, Chandigarh in the year 1989.

2. Though the challenge in each of the writ petition is to the separate order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (for short `the Tribunal), but all orders are co-related, passed on the basis of one or the other case. Since the facts are identical, we dispose of all the writ petitions by a common order. However, for the facility of reference, the facts are taken from Civil Writ Petition No. 10319- CAT of 2001.

3. Vide advertisement dated 5.8.1989 (Annexure P.3) posts of two lecturers in the pay scale of Rs. 700-1600/- were advertised. The petitioner Sumangal Roy applied in response to such advertisement and was selected after interview by a duly constituted Selection Committee vide letter of appointment dated 28.12.1989 (Annexure P.4).

4. At this stage, it may be noticed that the sel




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top