SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 13

M.M.KUMAR, RAJESH BINDAL
National Building Construction Corpn. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

M.M.KUMAR, J.

1. The prayer made by the petitioners in this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution is to declare paras VIII and XV of Clause 25 of the arbitration agreement, dated 8-11-2002 (Annexure P-2 as illegal and ultra vires. It has further been prayed to quash letter dated 18-8-2006 (Annexure P-8), issued by the Arbitrator-cum-Superintending Engineer, respondent No.2, to the petitioner calling upon it to deposit 10% of the amount of the claim submitted by him as per Clause VIII of the contract agreement before entering into arbitration.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner, which is a registered company owned by the Government of India, is engaged, inter alia, in execution of construction projects of national importance. It has its registered office at New Delhi. The instant petition is filed through the General Manager (Law) Mrs. Meera Shankar, who has Power of Attorney in her favour (Annexure P-1). The State of Punjab, respondent No.1, issued tenders for the erection, testing, commissioning, starting, stabilization and operation, monitoring and performance of 152 MLD STP based on USAB Technology at Balloke Zone C Ludhiana under Satluj Ac
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top