SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 25

RANJIT SINGH
Kirpal Singh Randhawa – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Ranjit Singh, J.

1. Kirpal Singh Randhawa, an important witness in the case of abduction and disappearance of Jaswant Singh Khalra, Human Rights Activist, seeks directions for his proper security, which, according to him, is being thinned despite the directions of the Honble Supreme Court. Jaswant Singh Khalra, was allegedly murdered brutally by group of nine police officials, including the then SSP, Tarn Taran, leading to registration of an FIR No. 14(S)/ 95/Delhi under Sections 120-B, 364, 302, 201 read with Section 34 IPC. This FIR had been registered under the directions of the Honble Supreme Court and was investigated by the CBI, which had presented this challan. The petitioner, who admittedly is an eye-witness in the murder case of Jaswant Singh Khalra, fears that his security is endangered in view of the withdrawal of Escort Gypsy earlier provided to him under the directions of the Honble Supreme Court, which has resulted in his security guard being ineffective in travelling with him, while he is required to go on some social or other such commitments. The perusal of the petition would reveal that the petitioner has given an eye-witness account in the case of aboveno






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top