SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 4378

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, RAJESH BINDAL
Commissioner Of C. Ex. , Delhi-iii, Gurgaon – Appellant
Versus
Myron Electricals Private Limited – Respondent


Judgment

1. This appeal has been preferred by the revenue against the order dated 24-8-2005 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi Principal Bench, New Delhi (for short, #24;the Tribunal#25;) in Appeal No. E/454/04/NB(S), proposing following substantial question of law :-

#28;Whether a manufacturer can avail credit on inputs on the strength of invoices issued by a dealer from the premises other than for which Central Excise registration has been granted under Rule 174 read with Rule 52AA of Central Excise Rules, 1944?#29;

2. The assessee claimed Modvat credit during the period from January 2000 to August 2000. The department issued a show cause notice disputing the claim of the assessee on the ground that the registered dealer had stopped functioning from the registered premises w.e.f. 30-9-1999. The adjudicating authority confirmed this demand and imposed penalty which was upheld by the appellate authority. The Tribunal has accepted the appeal of the assessee holding that payment of duty, receipt of inputs and use of inputs in the final product stood proved and as per clarification from the Board, credit could not be disallowed, once payment of





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top