RAJESH BINDAL, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Commissioner Of C. Ex. , Delhi-ii – Appellant
Versus
Hammer Forge – Respondent
1. The revenue has approached this Court by filing the present petition under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short, #28;the Act#29;) seeking a direction to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short, #28;the Tribunal#29;) to refer following question of law arising out of order passed by the Tribunal in final Order No. A/842/02/NB(SM), dated 4-7-2002.
(i) Whether credit is admissible in terms of erstwhile provisions of Rule 57C and 57CC used in both dutiable as well as exempted goods when no separate account has been maintained with respect to exempted goods? (ii Whether credit of the specific duty can be allowed on inputs used for manufacture of final product which are exempted from the whole of the duty or are chargeable to #24;nil#25; rate of duty? (ii Whether party is at least liable to pay 8% of the of the price (excluding sales tax and other taxes if any, payable on such goods), #24;even if credit of duty is allowed#25;?
2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in the manufacture of Steel forgings and forged articles other than stainless steel of two wheeler falling under Chapter Heading No. 8714.00 of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.