SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 3402

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, RAJESH BINDAL
Light Engg. Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

1. This petition challenges order passed by the Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission, New Delhi, rejecting application of the petitioner under Section 32E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short, the Act) in respect of show cause notice dated 4-3-2004, Annexure P.2.

2. In the show cause notice, Annexure P.2, it has been alleged that on 4-10-2003, Preventive Staff visited the factory premises of the assessee and found that the assessee was taking Cenvat credit on Pig Iron, though no infrastructure for casting iron was available in the factory. The representative of the assessee in a statement stated that electric fans under brand name "LEC Concorde" were being supplied to the railways. It was admitted by Shri Ravi Bartarya, partner of the assessee that they were selling Pig Iron in the open market and were not getting any job work done. It was also found that the noticee illegally availed of Cenvat credit on Copper wire. Certain other violations were also mentioned in the notice.

3. The assessee filed a petition under Section 32E of the Act before the Commission, wherein certain violations were admitted. The commission found that the petitioner was not candid




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top