SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 3057

T.P.S.MANN
Ramesh Chander – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

T.P.S.Mann, J.

1. The petitioner was tried in a private criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as `the Act) and sentenced to undergo RI for two years and to pay compensation to the tune of twice the amount of the cheques to the complainant Hari Ram. The aforementioned judgment of conviction and sentence dated 2/3.3.2005 passed by Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bhiwani was then challenged by the petitioner by filing an appeal, which was, however, dismissed by Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani on 16.3.2006. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the present revision.

2. When the revision came up for motion hearing, it was submitted that the parties had arrived at a compromise. Accordingly, notice of motion was issued and the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail on 3.4.2006. In response to the notice issued, the respondent put in appearance through his counsel. The parties placed on record a settlement deed containing the terms of compromise arrived at between them. Accordingly, on 18.4.2006, this Court directed the parties to appear in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani so that their statemen





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top