G.S.SINGHVI
Mani Raj – Appellant
Versus
Firm Radha Krishan Siri Niwas – Respondent
G.S.Singhvi, J.
1. This revision is directed against order dated 30.8.1993 passed by Rent Controller, Hansi partly declining the prayer of the petitioners for amendment by way of insertion of words "alleged to be" in the first line of paragraph 3 and second line of paragraph 6 of the ejectment application.
2. A perusal of the record shows that the petitioners filed an application for ejectment of the non-petitioners on the ground of non-payment of rent and also on the ground of making material alteration in the demised premises. During the pendency of the ejectment application, they filed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, CPC) for grant of leave to incorporate the following amendment:-
"a) In para No.3 of the ejectment application at page 4 (Internal) in first line the name of the firm be corrected as M/s Bhagat Ram Narain in place of Ram Narain Bhagat Ram.
b) In para No.3 of the ejectment application in first line before the word transfer and after the word Bhagat Ram, the word alleged to be ordered to be incorporated.
c) That in the 11th line of this paragraph firm M/s Bhagat Ram Narain be inducted in place of M/s Radha Krisha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.