SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 1058

G.S.SINGHVI
Mani Raj – Appellant
Versus
Firm Radha Krishan Siri Niwas – Respondent


Judgment

G.S.Singhvi, J.

1. This revision is directed against order dated 30.8.1993 passed by Rent Controller, Hansi partly declining the prayer of the petitioners for amendment by way of insertion of words "alleged to be" in the first line of paragraph 3 and second line of paragraph 6 of the ejectment application.

2. A perusal of the record shows that the petitioners filed an application for ejectment of the non-petitioners on the ground of non-payment of rent and also on the ground of making material alteration in the demised premises. During the pendency of the ejectment application, they filed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, CPC) for grant of leave to incorporate the following amendment:-

"a) In para No.3 of the ejectment application at page 4 (Internal) in first line the name of the firm be corrected as M/s Bhagat Ram Narain in place of Ram Narain Bhagat Ram.

b) In para No.3 of the ejectment application in first line before the word transfer and after the word Bhagat Ram, the word alleged to be ordered to be incorporated.

c) That in the 11th line of this paragraph firm M/s Bhagat Ram Narain be inducted in place of M/s Radha Krisha













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top