SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 1012

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Jasmel Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.

1. The petitioner-Union of India has filed the present writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the award dated 28.10.1997 (Annexure P-3), passed by Special Land Acquisition Collector, Jalandhar, respondent No. 5 herein, vide which he had re-determined the compensation payable to respondent No. 1 to 4 under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1984) in the light of the award dated 19.1.1985, passed by the Arbitrator cum Additional District Judge, Bathinda.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner acquired a big chunk of land belonging to various land owners for establishment of the Cantonment area at Bathinda, vide notification dated 20.1.1975 issued under Section 8 of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1952). In the said acquisition, 77 bighas 17 biswas of land belonging to Natha Singh, predecessor of respondents No. 1 to 4 was also acquired and award to the said acquisition was made on 6.3.1975 by the competent author











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top