SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 794

NIRMAL SINGH
Ito – Appellant
Versus
Usha Gupta – Respondent


Judgment

Nirmal Singh, J.

1. A complaint under sections 276C and 277 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was filed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward No. 1, Muktsar, against respondent Dr. Usha Gupta, proprietor M/s. Bansal Nursing Home, Muktsar on the ground that respondent had not shown Rs. 1 lakh in the income tax return filed by her on 29-8-1988.

2. The respondent was summoned in those proceedings. During the pendency of those proceedings the respondent filed an application for dropping the criminal proceedings against her. The petitioner pleaded in the application that she is being prosecuted for an offence that she had paid Rs. 1 lakh to M/s. Uniscan and Sonics Ltd., Chandigarh, and this amount has not been shown by the respondent in her account books. In the application, it was further pleaded that the respondent filed a revised return in which she had shown the amount. Even though, the respondent claimed that she came to know that M/s. Uniscans and Sonics Ltd., Chandigarh had wrongly credited this amount. The revised return was filed to avoid the legal complications.

3. On filing of the revised return by the respondent, the assessment was reopened and a s


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top