SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 716

V.M.JAIN
Satya Wati – Appellant
Versus
Mahadev Ramaji Pati – Respondent


Judgment

V.M.Jain, J.

1. This revision petition has been filed by landlords-petitioners against the judgments passed by the courts below whereby the ejectment petition filed by them had been dismissed by the learned Rent Controller and the appeal filed by them was dismissed by the appellate authority.

2. Facts, which are relevant for the decision of the present revision petition, are that the landlords filed ejectment petition dated 11.2.1994 under Section 13 of the East Punjab Rent Restriction Act, 1940, as applicable to U.T.Chandigarh, seeking ejectment of the respondent-tenant Mahadev Ramajt Patil from one room on the first floor besides common bath room and latrine. It was alleged that the petitioners were owners/landlords of the demised premises whereas the respondent was in possession of one room besides common bath room and latrine on the first floor as a tenant on a monthly rent of Rs. 250/-. Tt was alleged that petitioners purchased the said house vide registered sale deed dated 22.9.1993 for their own use and occupation to live comfortably in the said house and since then they became owners and landlords. It was alleged that petitioner No. 1 had family comprising of hersel

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top