SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 488

M.M.KUMAR
Raghbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sarita Sharma – Respondent


Judgment

M. M. Kumar, J.

1. This revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeks to challenge order dated 6.2.2002 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Hoshiarpur (forbrevity, the Tribunal), allowing the applcation of insurance company respondent no.4 to prove entry dated 29.4.1993 in the register of District Transport Office, amritsar (for brevity, the DTO), by leading secondary evidence in the form of verification report and to prove that the driving licence No.1604 dated 29.4.1993 was not issued by licensing authority.

2. Brief facts of the case which led to the filing of the present revision petition and necessary to decide the issue raised are that a claim petition under sec. 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 , being m. A. C. T. No.149 of 3.11.1998 has been filed by the claimant-respondent Nos.1 to 3 against the driver-petitioner, owner of the truck and the insurance company respondent No.4, claiming compensation on account of death of one Narinder Kumar. In the accident wife of Narinder Kumar, his daughter and son also suffered injuries. They also filed their claim in lieu of the injuries suffered by them. The petitioner who is driver o








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top