SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 446

M.M.KUMAR
Shayama Jain – Appellant
Versus
Savitri Devi – Respondent


Judgment

M. M. Kumar, J.

1. This is a revision petition directed against the order dated 24-8-2000 passed by the civil Judge (Junior Division), Narnaul dismissing the application filed by the applicant-petitioner under Order 1 rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for brevity, the Code) claiming that she was necessary and proper party and was, thus, liable to be impleaded.

2. Facts necessary for deciding the controversy raised in this revision petition are that plaintiff-respondent no.1 has filed the suit challenging the notice issued by the Municipal council, Narnaul under Sec.181 of the Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 (for brevity, the Act) wherein she has been asked to remove the illegal and unauthorised encroachment made by her by construction of staircase in the public street within a period of 7 days. In that suit only Municipal Council, narnaul has been joined as party defendant. Alongwith the suit plaintiff-respondent No.1 has filed an application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 of the Code praying for interim injunction. The Civil Judge has-granted the interim stay of demolition of staircase on the passage.

3. The applicant-petitioner in her application filed under Order 1, rul






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top