SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 323

M.L.SINGHAL
Satyawan – Appellant
Versus
Raghbir – Respondent


Judgment

1. This regular second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 16-4-1999 of the Additional District Judge, Panipat affirming that of the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Panipat dated 17-9-1997, whereby she (Civil Judge, Junior Division) had dismissed the plaintiffs (appellants herein) suit for declaration.

2. Facts:-

Plaintiffs Satyawan, Mohinder Singh and Ishwar Singh sons of Bir Singh filed suit for declaration against Raghbir Singh son of Desa son of Chandu to the effect that they are owners of land measuring 44 kanals 11 marlas detailed in para A of the head-note of the plaint, situated in the area of village Kurana, Tehsil Israna, District Panipat, shown in the Jamabandi for the year 1987-88 and mutation Nos. 5040, 5142 and defendant Raghbir Singh is the owner of land as detailed in para 8 of the head-note of the plaint, situated in the area of village Kurana, District Panipat shown in the jamabandi for the year 1987-88 and mutation No. 5247 and the judgment and decree dated 20-10-1992 passed in Civil Suit No. 959 of 1992 by Shri S. S. Lamba, Senior Sub-Judge, Panipat is illegal, null and void and was not binding on the plaintiffs and the same was based



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top