SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 159

ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA
Baldev Singh – Appellant
Versus
Dhanna Ram – Respondent


Judgment

Ashutosh Mohunta, J.

1. The present petition under Section 482, Code of Civil Procedure, has been filed for quashing the complaint dated February 8, 1993 (Annexure P2) and the summoning order dated July 24, 1993 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ambala City (Annexure P3).

2. Briefly the facts of the case are that the complainant-respondent, who was Sarpanch of village Fatehpur, Tehsil Kalka, District Ambala, issued notice to the petitioner to vacate the Kariana shop, which was constructed on the Panchayat land. The petitioner did not vacate the same, as a result of which there were inimical relations between the petitioner and the respondent. As the respondent-complainant tried to dispossess the petitioner from the shop, a complaint was filed under Sections 323, 427 and 506, Indian Penal Code, by the accused-petitioner against the complainant-respondent on January 29, 1991, in which various allegations were levelled against the present complainant- respondent.

3. As a counter-blast to the complaint filed by the accused-petitioner, the respondent also filed a complaint on February 8, 1993 under Section 500, Indian Penal Code, wherein it was alleged that the accuse











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top