PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
M.L.Singhal, J.
Dharampal
Versus
State Of Punjab
Criminal MISCELLANEOUS No. 31315 of 2001,
Decided On : JANUARY 11, 2002
Anticipatory Bail - Criminal Law - Ss. 326/148/149 of the Indian Penal Code - The court discussed the provisions of Ss. 326/148/149 of the Indian Penal Code and the principles governing the grant and cancellation of anticipatory bail.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought the cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondent in a case involving a violent altercation resulting in serious injuries.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the grant of anticipatory bail to the respondent was an act of grave indiscretion and seriously impinged upon judicial discipline and propriety.
Issues: The main issue was the cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondent despite previous refusals and the respondent being declared a proclaimed offender.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the law operates equally for all, irrespective of their status, and highlighted the principles governing the grant and cancellation of bail.
Final Decision: The court allowed the criminal misc. and cancelled the anticipatory bail, directing the issuance of non-bailable warrants for the respondent's arrest.
1. Through this Criminal Misc. No. 31315-M of 2001, Dharampal son of Biru Ram, resident of village Jhangrian, Police Station, Nurpur Bedi, Tehsil Anandpur Sahib, District Ropar, has prayed for the cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No. 2 (Gopal Chand) in case F.I.R. No. 36 dated 29-11-1998, registered at Police Station, Nurpur Bedi under Ss. 326/148/149 of the Indian Penal Code by Sessions Judge, Ropar vide order dated 13-6-2001.
2. The prosecution case in brief is that Dharampal owns one killa of land in village Nurpur Bed. He had sown Barseen fodder in 10 marlas of area out of this area. He had purchased water from Karam Chand for irrigating his land. Karam Chand had 1/4th share in the tubewell along with Sita Ram and Hari Singh. On 28-12-1998 at about 8.30 p.m. he had gone to irrigate his fields. He was called by his son Naresh Kumar aged about 10/11 years to irrigate the fields. Naresh Kumar had gone to the fields earlier and found Karam Chand at the tubewell. Karam Chand was present at the tubewell but he did not see where he was standing. Naresh Kumar was busy irrigating his fields. Dharampal stoodnear Naresh Kumar. When they irrigated the fields, Dharampal asked his son to tell Karam Chand (Taya) to stop the motor. Thereupon, Karam Chand told Naresh Kumar to give message to his father Dharampal to help him irrigating his fields. Dharampal started towards the fields of Karam Chand, when he went there, Karam Chand had also come to the fields. When they had irrigated 3-4 fields, the motor stopped. Dharampal and Karam Chand went towards the motor to see why the motor had stopped. Dharampal was about 10 karams ahead of Karam Chand. When Dharampal was at a distance of about 7-8- karams from the motor, Sita Ram was standing near the kotha. On seeing Dharampal and Karam Chand, he started raising raula "Mar Ditta, Mar Ditta." In the meantime, 5-6 persons came running from the village side. Gopal Chand Ex Sarpanch attacked Dharampal with his Kirpan. He raised his right and to ward off the blow. As a result, his two fingers i.e. little finger and ring finger were chopped off. Sita Ram gave Dang blows on the left shoulder of Dharampal. Thereafter, Dharamvir son of Sarup gave gandasi blow which fell on the calf of Dharampal. Nasib Chand son of Balbir Singh and Dharampal son of Dhani Ram were also there. Dharampal raised raula "Mar Ditta Mar Ditta." Karam Chand ran away towards the village. From the village, Dharampals brother Amar Chand and his tayas sons Mohinder and Ram Parkash, Banarsi son of Munshi Ram and many other men and women and Karam Chand also came there. As per Dharampal complaint, he was given injuries because he had worked against Gopal Chand in the Panchayat election.
3. Gopal Chand made an application (Criminal Misc. No. 1916-M of 1999) for the grant of anticipatory bail.
4. Balbir Singh son of Nasib Chand and Dharamvir son of Sarup made an application (Criminal Misc. No. 1482-M).
5. Vide detailed order dated 6-7-1999 Annexure P passed in Criminal Misc. No. 1482-M of 1999, this Court gave anticipatory bail to Balbir Singh. Anticipatory bail was refused to Dharamvir son of Sarup and Gopal Chand so of Gokal Chand (respondent No. 2 herein).
6. Gopal Chand and Dharamvir went to the Hon ble Supreme Court against this order refusing the anticipatory bail through petitions for special leave to appeal (Criminal) Nos. 2306-2307/1999). The Hon ble Supreme Court passed order on 9-8-1999 in the followiing terms :-
"We are not inclined to invoke our jurisdiction under S. 438, Cr. P.C. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed accordingly."
7. Vide order dated 24-4-2000, Sessions Judge, Ropar had declined anticipatory bail to Gopal Chand. Gopal Chand again made an application for the grant of anticipatory bail to the Court of Sessions Judge, Ropar which was dismissed by him on 22-1-2001, vide Annexure P4.
8. Vide order dated 13-6-2001 which has been impugned by Dharampal son of Biru Ram through this Cri
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.