SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 80

HARJIT SINGH BEDI, ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA
Teka @ Tek Chand – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Harjit Singh Bedi, J.

1. This appeal arises out of the following facts :-

Kishan Chand (deceased) a resident of village Pinangwan, was a Goldsmith by profession. On January 22, 1991 he left for village Ramgarh to meet his brother-in-law but did not return thereafter. On January 27, 1991, P-4 Giani Ram, Kishan Chands son heard a rumour that a skeleton was lying in the fields of one Jagdish in Village Punhana. On receiving this information, Giani Ram aforesaid, his younger brother, Dayalu and uncle, Paras Ram, went to that place and found the skeleton lying in the fields with a Kurta, Pyjama, Safi, Sweater, Banian, Shoe and socks lying near the skeleton. Giani Ram identified the clothes as having been worn by his father when he had left the house on January 22, 1991. On inquiry, Giani Ram also received information that Ramesh had seen Kishan Chand alongwith Teka son of Ram Chand resident of village Pinangwan, going towards the Safeda trees and that the two had taken liquor together in the house of Puran son of Buli. This information was furnished to the police and an F.I.R. was recorded on January 27, 1991 and the apprehension was also expressed therein that as Kishan Chand h









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top