SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(P&H) 1405

M.L.SINGHAL
Chhote Lal @ Baba Chhail Bihari Sharan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

M.L.Singhal, J.

1. Heard. According to the prosecution, 250 grams of charas was recovered from the possession of the accused on 15.3.2001.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the recovery of the charas weighing 250 grams is not "commercial quantity" because as per notification dated 19.10.2001 published in the Gazette of India, charas weighing 1 kg. or more will be "commercial quantity". The provisions of section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 will not apply as these lay down that before grant of bail, the court has to be satisfied that the accused has not committed the offence and further if released on bail, he will not indulge in the commission of that offence. He submits that the grant of bail in such cases would be governed by the provisions of Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He further submits that the trial will take a long time and it would be unjust to keep the accused in custody in such circumstances.

3. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I allow bail to the petitioner which shall be to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panipat.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top