SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(P&H) 1330

BAKHSHISH KAUR
Kamla Devi Vij – Appellant
Versus
Karanvir Dhir – Respondent


Judgment

Bakhshish Kaur, J.

1. Does renting out a premises amount to alienation or not ? Davinder Kumar and Ram Kumar sons of Sakhi Chand Dhir had filed a suit against Karanvir and others. Smt. Kamla Devi Vij-petitioner is one of the sisters of Davinder Kumar and Karanvir Singh. She is arrayed as one of the respondents in the RSA arising out of the suit filed by Davinder Kumar and Ram Kumar sons of Sakhi Chand Dhir.

2. A civil miscellaneous application bearing No. 3879-C of 1996 was filed in the RSA. Notice was issued to Karanvir and others appellants-respondents through their counsel for October 1996, directing them not to alienate the property in dispute. Copy of the order is dated September 17, 1986 Annexure P-1. This order was made absolute on October 04, 1996, copy of which is Annexure P-2.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the stay order, Karanvir- respondent has given on rent one of the shops which are the subject matter of RSA. It has been let out to Amarjit Singh son of Shri Balwant Singh on July 17, 1999. By doing so, the respondent has wilfully disobeyed the stay orders dated September 17, 1998 (Annexure P-1) and October 04, 1996 (Annexure P-2). Hence thi










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top