Back
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Nirmal Singh, J.
Parveen
Versus
State Of Haryana
CRM No. 41274 of 2001,
Decided On : NOVEMBER 28, 2001
Conspiracy - Bail - The court admitted the petitioner to bail without commenting on the merits of the case, as the petitioner's case was not distinguishable from others who had already been released on bail.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was alleged to be involved in a conspiracy to commit dacoity with others. Some co-accused had already been released on bail.
Finding of the Court:
The court admitted the petitioner to bail without commenting on the merits of the case.
Issues: Allegation of conspiracy to commit dacoity, bail application
Ratio Decidendi: The petitioner's case was not distinguishable from others who had already been released on bail, leading the court to admit the petitioner to bail.
Final Decision: The petitioner was admitted to bail to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Sonepat.
Nirmal Singh, J.
1. The allegation against the petitioner is that he was making a conspiracy to commit dacoity alongwith Gurdayal, Naresh @ Nitu, Sanjeev, Sushil, etc. Gurdayal, Sanjeev and Sushil have already been released on bail. The case of the petitioner is not distinguishable than those.
2. So without making any comments on the merits of the case, the petitioner be admitted to bail to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Sonepat.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
