PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
M.L.Singhal, J.
Tarsem Singh
Versus
Parkash Kaur
Civil Revision No. 2849 of 2000,
Decided On : NOVEMBER 21, 2001
Injunction - Property Dispute - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2, CPC - Sec. 151, CPC - Mukhtiar Singh V/s. Tara Singh, 2000 (3) All Instant Judgments 490 - Bachan Singh V/s. Swaran Singh, 2000 (3) Civil Court Cases 2 - Sant Ram Nagina Ram V/s. Daya Ram Nagina Ram, AIR 1961 Punj 528
Fact of the Case:
Smt. Parkash Kaur filed a suit for permanent injunction against Tarsem Singh and Sardul Singh, claiming ownership of a property inherited from her deceased husband. The defendants argued that they had purchased a portion of the property from the heirs of the deceased and were entitled to make constructions on it.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the defendants had purchased a portion of the property from the heirs of the deceased and were in exclusive possession of it. As a result, they were entitled to make constructions on the property, subject to the condition that they would remove the constructions if that portion fell to the share of other co-owners on partition.
Issues: The main issue was whether the defendants, as co-sharers in possession of a portion of the property, could be restrained from making constructions on it.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on legal principles established in Mukhtiar Singh V/s. Tara Singh, Bachan Singh V/s. Swaran Singh, and Sant Ram Nagina Ram V/s. Daya Ram Nagina Ram to determine that co-sharers in possession of a portion of the property have the right to make constructions, subject to partition.
Final Decision: The court allowed the revision, vacated the temporary injunction, and ruled that the defendants were entitled to make constructions on the portion of the property purchased by them, with the condition that they would remove the constructions if that portion fell to the share of other co-owners on partition.
1. Smt. Parkash Kaur filed suit for permanent injunction against Tarsem Singh and Sardul Singh restraining them from making any addition or alteration or reconstruction or changing the nature of the property ABCD as shown in the plan attached to the plaint as detailed in the heading of the plaint situated at Dhangu Road, Pathankot illegally, forcibly and without due course of law, on the allegations that the property in suit was owned and possessed by Ajit Singh son of Wadhwa Singh who had purchased it from the Managing Offcer, Jalandhar vide deed of conveyance dated 3-3-67 registered on 5-5-67. After the death of Ajit Singh, his estate was inherited by his sons Narindar Singh, Gurmit Singh and Harjinder Singh, daughter Smt. Balwinder Kaur and widow Smt. Parkash Kaur. Smt. Parkash Kaur plaintiff thus inherited 1/5th share in the property in suit. Plaintiff and other heirs of Ajit Singh filed Civil Suit No. 88 of 1987 against Dalip Singh, father of the defendants in respect of the property in suit in the Court of Additional Senior Subordinate Judge, Pathankot along with other properties which was decreed on 3-6-1988. Besides the property in suit, Ajit Singh had left properties situated at Village Ugrewal, Batala, Pathankot, etc. Said Dalip Singh in a fraudulent manner in collusion and conspiracy with Arbitrator without any proper authorisation and without delegating the powers to the Arbitrator obtained illegal award on 2-9-95. Said award was challenged in Batala Court. On 30-5-96, at 10 a.m. the defendants wanted to change the nature of the suit property but their attempt was foiled due to the intervention of the respectables of the locality. When the defendants were asked as to why they were trying to change the nature of the property in suit, they replied that they had purchased the suit property from the sons of the plaintiff i.e. Narinder Singh etc. Plaintiff does not concede any sale of the property in suit by Narinder Singh etc. to the defendants. Assuming that Narinder Singh etc. sold the property in suit to the defendants, defendants had no right to change the nature of the suit property which is continuing to be joint. Without getting it partitioned amongst co-sharers, defendants can effect no change in the suit property. Along with the plaint, the plaintiff made an application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2, CPC read with Sec. 151, CPC for the grant of temporary injunction restraining the defendants from making any addition or alteration or reconstruction or changing the nature of the property in suit till the disposal of the suit.
2. Vide order dated 17-8-96, this prayer was allowed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Pathankot and defendants were restrained from raising any further construction on the property in suit or changing its nature in any manner till the disposal of the suit.
3. Defendants went in appeal. Vide order dated 19-4-2000, Additional District Judge, Gurdaspur dismissed the appeal. Still not satisfied, Tarsem Singh and Sardul Singh defendants have come up in revision to this Court.
4. I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and have gone through the record.
5. It was submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that no co-sharer can seek injunction restraining another co-sharer from raising any construction on the property which is in his exclusive possession. It was submitted that total area measures 49 marlas and there are thus 6 co-owners. Everyone has raised construction in the area of his/her respective possession. Petitioners have raised construction up to lintel level. In the written statement, the defendants have pleaded that the plaintiff is not in possession of the property in suit. It was denied that property in suit was owned and possessed by Ajit Singh son of Wadhawa Singh or that he purchased it from the Managing Officer vide conveyance deed dated 3-3-67 registered on 5-5-67. Estate of Ajit Singh devolved upon his 3 sons namely Narinder Singh, Gurmit Singh and H
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.