SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(P&H) 1295

M.L.SINGHAL
Tarsem Singh – Appellant
Versus
Parkash Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

1. Smt. Parkash Kaur filed suit for permanent injunction against Tarsem Singh and Sardul Singh restraining them from making any addition or alteration or reconstruction or changing the nature of the property ABCD as shown in the plan attached to the plaint as detailed in the heading of the plaint situated at Dhangu Road, Pathankot illegally, forcibly and without due course of law, on the allegations that the property in suit was owned and possessed by Ajit Singh son of Wadhwa Singh who had purchased it from the Managing Offcer, Jalandhar vide deed of conveyance dated 3-3-67 registered on 5-5-67. After the death of Ajit Singh, his estate was inherited by his sons Narindar Singh, Gurmit Singh and Harjinder Singh, daughter Smt. Balwinder Kaur and widow Smt. Parkash Kaur. Smt. Parkash Kaur plaintiff thus inherited 1/5th share in the property in suit. Plaintiff and other heirs of Ajit Singh filed Civil Suit No. 88 of 1987 against Dalip Singh, father of the defendants in respect of the property in suit in the Court of Additional Senior Subordinate Judge, Pathankot along with other properties which was decreed on 3-6-1988. Besides the property in suit, Ajit Singh had left properti











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top