SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(P&H) 1138

V.M.JAIN
Juber – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

V.M.Jain, J.

1. This is a petition under Section 482, CrPC, filed by the accused-petitioner, seeking quashment of FIR 235 dated 14.9.1996 under Section 377, IPC, registered in Police Station, Tauru (District Gurgaon) and all subsequent proceedings, arising out of the said FIR, on the basis of the compromise.

2. In the petition, it was alleged that the petitioner was challaned by the Police in the aforesaid FIR, which was lodged by complainant-respondent No. 1, Shaukat. It was alleged that after the submission of the challan, the accused-petitioner was tried for the offence under Section 377, IPC and vide judgment dated 20.8.1999, he was convicted under Section 377 IPC, and was sentenced to undergo RI for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/-. It was alleged that aggrieved against the aforesaid judgment of the trial Court, the accused-petitioner had filed an Appeal before the Sessions Court and the same was now fixed 16.10.2001. It was alleged that during pendency of the Appeal, the accused-petitioner and the complainant-respondent No. 2, arrived at a compromise with the intervention of the respectables of the village, including the Sarpanch and the Lambardar and as a











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top