SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(P&H) 920

S.S.SUDHALKAR, MEHTAB S.GILL
Nestle India Limited – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bhatinda – Respondent


Judgment

, J.

1. In this Civil Writ Petition as well as in civil Writ Petition Nos.4629 and 4630 of 1999, common questions of fact and law are involved. Therefore, all the three Civil Writ petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment. However, facts have been extracted from Civil Writ Petition No.4628 of 1999.

2. The petitioner company has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing award dated June 19, 1998, copy annexure P13.

3. The petitioner-Company has averred that it is manufacturing food products and milk is one of the important raw materials which is purchased from the farmers rearing milch cattle. Since there are large number of fanners from whom milk is to be collected and they are scattered in the villages surrounding the factory, the petitioner engages Agents for this purpose and enters into agreement/contract with each one of them in different areas from where the milk is to be collected. These agents are paid commission for collecting milk and the amount payable is based on the quantity and quality of milk. These Agents continue to pursue their other business/occupation even during the period they hold agency for the collection of





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top