SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(P&H) 928

V.M.JAIN
Murli Manohar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

1. This is a petition under Section 482, Cr. P. C., for quashing the criminal complaint under Sections 3k(i), 9, 17, 18, 21(b), 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Rules 16 and 19 of the Insecticides Rules, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) and for quashing of all consequent proceedings, arising out of the said complaint.

2. It was alleged that M/s. Madhu Sudan Industries, was a manufacturing industry, manufacturing different types of insecticides and pesticides and that petitioner, Murli Manohar, was the Managing Director of the said company. It was alleged that a criminal complaint had been filed by the Insecticides Inspector against the said company and Murli Manohar, petitioner, and others, with the allegations that the Insecticides Inspector had inspected the shop of M/s. Kasturi Lal and company on 7-7-1993, and had taken the sample and one part of the sample was sent to the Insecticides Testing Laboratory and the Senior Analyst of the said Laboratory found the said sample misbranded and accordingly, the complaint under the Act was filed on 24-10-1994. It was alleged that the petitioner was the Managing Direc






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top