SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(P&H) 446

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Jawahar Lal Gupta and N.K.Sud JJ.
Subhash Sharma
Versus
State Of Haryana
Civil Writ Petition No. 14343 of 2000,
Decided On : APRIL 20, 2001

The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to direct the Central Bureau of Investigation to conduct an investigation into illegal mining activities, ensuring public confidence and above-suspicion report.

Headnote:

Illegal Mining - Environmental Protection - [Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Section 4(1)] - The court found that illegal mining operations were ongoing in the area, leading to theft of public property and causing significant loss to the state exchequer. The court directed the Central Bureau of Investigation to register a case and conduct an investigation into the mining of minerals in the District of Faridabad, including the conduct of the officers involved. It also ordered the proper demarcation of the area allotted to each lessee and strict vigilance to be maintained to prevent further illegal mining.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a journalist, alleged that a Cabinet Minister in the State of Haryana was involved in illegal mining activities in connivance with officials, causing significant loss to the state exchequer. The petitioner sought a writ in the nature of mandamus to stop the illegal extraction and take appropriate action.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that illegal mining operations were ongoing in the area, leading to theft of public property and causing significant loss to the state exchequer. It directed the Central Bureau of Investigation to register a case and conduct an investigation into the mining of minerals in the District of Faridabad, including the conduct of the officers involved.

Issues: 1. Whether there were grounds for the registration of a case and its investigation. 2. Who should conduct the investigation into the illegal mining activities.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that there were grounds for the registration of a case and its investigation, and directed the Central Bureau of Investigation to conduct the investigation to ensure public confidence and above-suspicion report. It also ordered the proper demarcation of the area allotted to each lessee and strict vigilance to be maintained to prevent further illegal mining.

Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with the direction for the Central Bureau of Investigation to register a case and conduct an investigation into the illegal mining activities, including the conduct of the officers involved. The court also ordered the proper demarcation of the area allotted to each lessee and strict vigilance to be maintained to prevent further illegal mining.

JudgmentJudgment

JAWAHAR LAL GUPTA, J.

1. The Petitioner - a journalist has approached this Court with the allegation that "the protectors of the national wealth have joined hands with the predators and the loot of minerals is going on unabated". According to him, the eighth respondent is a Cabinet Minister in the State of Haryana. He belongs to District Faridabad and is known as "the mining king and controls the mining mafia ...." In connivance with "the officials of the Mining Department, Local Administration etc, he is continuously indulging in illegal mining in the entire District Faridabad and more particularly in the area which is popularly known as Ishq Mandi comprising of Khasra No. 46 of Village Anangpur and Khasra No 15 of Village Ankhir". He further alleges that the area is rich in Silica sand. Respondent No.8 has set up more than 20 mini crushers. He possesses excavators, dumpers, motor tractors and drilling machines besides a fleet of trucks under the name of K.T.C. The said machines are being operated day and night. The minerals in crushed form are loaded in dumpers and taken away. Part of these are also transported to his crushers namely Mohan Mines (P) Limited and Meera Stones. To support this submission, the petitioner has produced certain photographs which has allegedly been taken on October 13, 2000. He has also referred to certain newspaper reports which had appeared in the Press in support of his allegations. It is alleged that "the officers of the Mining Department and the Local Administration have taken no steps whatsoever to stop the illegal mining". He further alleges that respondent No. 9 is a close associate of respondent No. 8. The 9th respondent is holding the adjoining quarry of Badkhal. The two respondents are "in connivance with each other illegally mining, storing and stacking the minerals which are illegally extracted .......and are sharing the booty without payment of royalty and tax to the State". On these premises, the petitioner prays that a writ in the nature of mandamus be issued directing the respondent-authorities to take immediate steps to stop the illegal extraction. He also prays that such other action as may be deemed proper in the circumstances of the case be taken.

2. This petition was posted for preliminary hearing before a Bench of this Court of which one of us (Jawahar Lal Gupta, J) was a member on October 19,2000. At the request of the counsel for the petitioner, Mr. R. S. Bains , an Advocate of this Court was appointed as the Local Commissioner to visit the site and submit a report. The case was adjourned to November 2, 2000. After the receipt of the report, it was directed that notice of motion shall issue for November 16, 2000.

3. In response to the notice, separate written statements have been filed on behalf on some of the respondents. On behalf of respondent Nos.1, 3, 4 and 5, a written statement was filed by Mr. S. N. Roy, Director, Mines and Geology, Haryana. Respondent No. 6 - the Director of Mines Safety, Ghaziabad Region also filed a reply. Written statements have also been filed by respondent Nos. 7, 8 and 9. The claim made by the petitioner has been controverted.

4. The report of the Local Commissioner was initially kept in a sealed cover. On December 8, 2000, the Advocate General, Haryana had made a request to the Bench to adjourn the hearing so as to enable the State and its authorities to depute a senior officer to visit the site, hold an enquiry and submit a report regarding the factual position. This request was granted. The case was adjourned to January 12, 2001. Thereafter, it was again adjourned at the request of the counsel. On January 31, 2001, the Advocate General had produced before us the report submitted by Mr. B.D. Dhalia, Financial Commissioner, Haryana. The report was taken on record. Simultaneously, it was directed that the report submitted by the Local Commissioner Mr. R. S. Bains which was in a sealed cover be opened and copies thereof be suppl
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top