K.S.KUMARAN
Raj Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
K.S.KUMARAN, J.
1. Second respondent Mukhtiar Kaur and the third respondent Choti Kaur lodged a complaint before the City Police Station, Mansa under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 34 IPC (annexure P-1). They have alleged in this complaint that the petitioners 1 to 3, i.e. Raj Singh, Mal Singh and Punjab Singh filed a regular suit in the Court of Shri G.S. Dhillon and got the judgment and decree against the complainants by misrepresentation and substituting some other ladies in their place. According to the complainants, it is a clear case of forgery and impersonation since they were never served in this case. According to the complaint, the complainants never appeared in the court nor submitted any statement in the court, and the petitioners got some other ladies in place of the complainants and got a decree in respect of the lands of the complainants. Therefore, they had prayed that a case under sections 467, 468, 420, 419 and 34 IPC may be registered against them. The fourth petitioner is said to have identified the impersonators. The police have registered the case under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC.
2. The four petitioners have now come forward with
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.