SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(P&H) 226

K.S.KUMARAN
Raj Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

K.S.KUMARAN, J.

1. Second respondent Mukhtiar Kaur and the third respondent Choti Kaur lodged a complaint before the City Police Station, Mansa under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 34 IPC (annexure P-1). They have alleged in this complaint that the petitioners 1 to 3, i.e. Raj Singh, Mal Singh and Punjab Singh filed a regular suit in the Court of Shri G.S. Dhillon and got the judgment and decree against the complainants by misrepresentation and substituting some other ladies in their place. According to the complainants, it is a clear case of forgery and impersonation since they were never served in this case. According to the complaint, the complainants never appeared in the court nor submitted any statement in the court, and the petitioners got some other ladies in place of the complainants and got a decree in respect of the lands of the complainants. Therefore, they had prayed that a case under sections 467, 468, 420, 419 and 34 IPC may be registered against them. The fourth petitioner is said to have identified the impersonators. The police have registered the case under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC.

2. The four petitioners have now come forward with





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top