SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(P&H) 194

V.S.AGGARWAL
Mukhtiar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

1. The sole question that arises for consideration is as to whether during investigation the Judicial Magistrate can direct a person to give his thumb impression or not ?

2. To appreciate and said controversy, it will be appropriate to mention some of the relevant facts. A case is being investigated against Mukhtiar Singh petitioner with respect to the offences punishable under Sections 419/420/467/468 and 471 IPC. The prosecution/State had moved an application with the learned Judicial Magistrate for directing the petitioner to give his thumb impressions for comparing the same which are required in investigation of the case. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Zira relying upon the decision of this Court in the case of Dharamvir Singh V/s. State 1975 CLR 46 : (1975 Cri LJ 884) rejected the request of the prosecution/State. The State preferred a criminal revision petition in the Court of Sessions at Ferozepur. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ferozepur vide order dated 27-5-1996 allowed the revision petition. It was held that such an order could be passedduring investigation directing an accused-person to give his thumb impression. Hence, the present revision petition.

3















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top