SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(P&H) 149

M.L.SINGHAL
Amit Garg – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

M.L.Singhal, J.

1. Perusal of this Crl. Misc. petition shows that at the instance of Amit Garg-petitioner, case FIR No. 344, dated 24.7.1996 under sections 365, 387, 504/34 IPC was registered at P.S. Ambala Cantt. on the basis of application sent by him to S.P., Ambala. His grievance now is that this case is not being investigated honestly and impartially by the local police and the police are siding with the accused. On 7th September, 1996, a constable came to his house at about 9 p.m. and he told him that he was called by SHO, PS Ambala Cantt., in connection with the investigation of the aforesaid case. He along with his father went to PS Ambala Cantt. where Shri Arun Nehra, the S.H.O. of PS Ambala Cantt. was found present in his room. Accused Neeraj Kumar Singhal and Vicky Bhatia were occupying chairs. On seeing him and his father, Shri Arun Nehra became infuriated and started hurling abuse on them and he threatened that he would twist the investigation in a manner that the case would be cancelled and they would be proceeded against, under Section 182 IPC. He pressurised him to make statements with drawing the case. He obtained his signatures and the signatures of his fa



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top