SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(P&H) 99

N.K.AGRAWAL
Jainti Parshad Jain – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Committee, Ferozepore City – Respondent


Judgment

1. Since common question of law arises in Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 4761 and 4911 of 1983, No.1801 of 1985. No. 5604 of 1981, Nos. 2257, 3181, 3182, 3183, 3184 and 4573 of 1982 and Civil Revision No. 1833 of 1984, these are all being decided by this common order.

2. Levy of house tax has been challenged in the aforesaid writ petitions. Some petitions have been filed by the petitioners whose properties are situated in the State of Punjab and some petitions arise from the state of Haryana. It will be convenient to discuss the two sets of petitions, one belonging to the State of Punjab and the other belonging to the State of Haryana, separately inasmuch as the question of applicability of the relevant rent control law would be decided differently.

3. Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 4761 and 4911 of 1983, No. 2257 of 1982 and No. 1801 of 1985 relate to the properties situated in the State of Punjab. Civil Revision No. 1833 of 1984 also relates to a property situated in the State of Punjab. House tax was levied after assessing the annual rental value at a higher rate by the respective Municipal Committees and Corporations on the basis of the prevalent market rate of rent. The petition





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top