N.K.AGRAWAL
Jainti Parshad Jain – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Committee, Ferozepore City – Respondent
1. Since common question of law arises in Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 4761 and 4911 of 1983, No.1801 of 1985. No. 5604 of 1981, Nos. 2257, 3181, 3182, 3183, 3184 and 4573 of 1982 and Civil Revision No. 1833 of 1984, these are all being decided by this common order.
2. Levy of house tax has been challenged in the aforesaid writ petitions. Some petitions have been filed by the petitioners whose properties are situated in the State of Punjab and some petitions arise from the state of Haryana. It will be convenient to discuss the two sets of petitions, one belonging to the State of Punjab and the other belonging to the State of Haryana, separately inasmuch as the question of applicability of the relevant rent control law would be decided differently.
3. Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 4761 and 4911 of 1983, No. 2257 of 1982 and No. 1801 of 1985 relate to the properties situated in the State of Punjab. Civil Revision No. 1833 of 1984 also relates to a property situated in the State of Punjab. House tax was levied after assessing the annual rental value at a higher rate by the respective Municipal Committees and Corporations on the basis of the prevalent market rate of rent. The petition
Corporation Of Calcutta V/s. Smt. Padma Debi
Dewan Daulat Rai Kapoor V.New Delhi Municipal Committee
Municipal Corporation, Indore V/s. Smt. Ratna Prabha
Srikant Kashinath Jituri V..Corporation Of The City Of Belgaum
Assistant General Manager, Central Bank Of India Etc. V/s. Commr.Municipal
Corporation Of Calcutta V/s. Life Insurance Corporation Of India
Guntur Municipal Council V/s. Guntur Town Rate Payers Association
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.