SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(P&H) 127

M.L.KOUL, AMARJEET CHAUDHARY
Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

M.L.KOUL, J.

1. The appellant Vinod Kumar (hereinafter the accused) held guilty of an offence under S. 302, of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life has preferrd this appeal for setting aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentence recorded against him by the learned Additional Sessions Judge,Kaithal dated 4-5-1994.

2. The brief facts of the case giving rise to this appeal are that one Ramanand Sarswati, Pujari of Hanuman temple in village Teontha was done away by the accused on 22-5-1992 at 5.15 a.m. in presence of the complainant Ram Sarup PW 1 and another prosecution witness-Sunil Kumar who afterwards was given up by the prosecution. According to the complainant the accused inflicted knife blow on the left side of the abdomen of the deceased (hereinafter called the Baba) saying that he would teach him a lesson for having levelled the allegations of theft against him earlier and the said baba fell down and part of his intestines came out. The accused ran away from the spot with the weapon of offence by jumping over a wall of the temple. The said Baba was made to lie by the complainant at a place in front of his room in the temple and he succum













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top