1996 Supreme(P&H) 1820
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
R.L.Anand, J.
Punjab Wakf Board
Versus
State Of Punjab
Civil Writ Petition No. 4138 of 1980,
Decided On : DECEMBER 16, 1996
A public wakf property must be dedicated to a pious, religious, or charitable purpose and must be recognized by Muslim law. To establish a public wakf property, it is necessary to show that the property was dedicated by a person professing Islam and that it was used by the Muslim community for the intended purpose.
Headnote:
WAKF PROPERTY - PUBLIC GRAVEYARD - OWNERSHIP - REVENUE RECORDS - DEDICATION - USER - EVACUEE PROPERTY ACT, 1950 - ADMINISTRATION OF EVACUEE PROPERTY ACT, 1950 - SECTION 54 - CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908 - ORDER 23 RULE 1 - RES JUDICATA - WRIT JURISDICTION - DISPUTED QUESTION OF FACT.
Fact of the Case:
Punjab Wakf Board filed a writ petition challenging the impugned orders of the State of Punjab, the Custodian General of Evacuee Property, Punjab, and Rakesh Kumar, alleging that the sale of the disputed property in favor of Rakesh Kumar was illegal, null and void, and that the Board was the authority to manage the disputed property as it was wakf property.
Finding of the Court:
1. The disputed property was initially owned by Mohammadons and was used as a Kabristan (graveyard). 2. The revenue records showed that the property was recorded as Ghair Mumkin Kabristan of Ahle Islam, indicating that it was a graveyard for the Muslim community. 3. The property was acquired by the Central Government as evacuee property after the partition of India. 4. The Board claimed that the property was a public wakf property and that it vested in the Board. 5. The Board filed a civil suit for declaration of ownership and injunction, but the suit was dismissed for want of notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 6. The Board filed a revision petition before the Financial Commissioner under Section 54 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, which was also dismissed. 7. The Board filed the present writ petition challenging the impugned orders.
Issues: 1. Whether the disputed property was a public wakf property or an evacuee property. 2. Whether the Board had the authority to manage the disputed property. 3. Whether the sale of the disputed property in favor of Rakesh Kumar was legal and valid. 4. Whether the Board was barred from filing the writ petition due to res judicata.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. A public wakf property is one that is dedicated to a pious, religious, or charitable purpose and is recognized by Muslim law. 2. To establish a public wakf property, it is necessary to show that the property was dedicated by a person professing Islam and that it was used by the Muslim community for the intended purpose. 3. The revenue records showing the property as Ghair Mumkin Kabristan of Ahle Islam were not sufficient to establish that the property was a public wakf property. 4. The Board failed to provide any evidence to show that the property was dedicated to the wakf or that it was being used as a public graveyard. 5. The property was acquired by the Central Government as evacuee property, and the Board did not challenge the acquisition. 6. The Board's civil suit for declaration of ownership and injunction was dismissed for want of notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 7. The Board's revision petition before the Financial Commissioner under Section 54 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, was also dismissed. 8. The Board was barred from filing the writ petition due to res judicata, as it had already filed a civil suit and a revision petition on the same cause of action.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed.
R.L.Anand, J.
1. Punjab Wakf Board, Ambala Cantt. (hereinafter called the Board), has filed the present writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India against the State of Punjab, The Custodian General of Evacuee Property, Punjab and Rakesh Kumar praying for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for the quashment of the impugned orders Annexures P.2 to P.4 and for declaration that sale of the disputed property in favour of respondent No. 3 was illegal, null and void and that the Board is the authority to manage the disputed property, the same being wakf property and as such it vests in the Board petitioner.
2. The case set up by the Board is that there is land in the revenue estate of Dina Nagar bearing old khasra Nos. 31 (9-16), and 21 (-6-17), Post consolidation Nos. 35 (8-13) and 34 (5-11). Originally this land was owned by Mohammadons and they converted it as Kabristan and in the Jamabandi for the year 1910-11 it was recorded as grave yard Ahle Islam. According to the marked entries of the owners thus property continued to be described in the revenue record as Ghair Mumkin Kabristan of Ahle Islam, meaning thereby that Mohammadonion Community without any restriction by the owner thereof had been burrying their dead bodies and had become the grave yard due to its use for a long time by Mohammadons and same state was reflected in the Jamabandi for the year 1961-62. The consolidation took place and the entries in the Jamabandis showed in the column of ownership for the year 1961-62, Central Governments as its owner though entries in all other columns remained the same as before. The petitioner Board has been managing the property and leased out this property to one Ganda Mal of Dina Nagar, who was in cultivating possession of the property under the petitioner and this fact was verified by him and mutation has also been decreed in favour of the petitioner. At the spot some of the portion of the grave yard has been left for the present need along with the building of mosque as it existed and rest was in the possession of the lessee Ganda Mal. That in the year 1976, Tehsildar (Sales-cum-Managing Officer,) auctioned this property on 28.12.1976 in favour of Rakesh Kumar, treating it as Central Govt. acquired evacuee property. The petitioner filed a suit for declaration that the property was of the petitioner and also brought therein for the injunction restraining the respondent from taking the possession of the land from the lessee Ganda Mal, but on objection of the other side that the Civil Court had no jurisdiction, the suit of the petitioner Board was dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner filed objection petition against the said auction before the Settlement Commissioner, which was decided vide order dated 16.5.77 who set aside the sale qua khasra No. 35 but dismissed the objection for khasra No. 34 vide orders Annexure P.2. The objections were dismissed as according to the Settlement Commissioner the same lay before the Custodian General Punjab, as the property has been shown that of Central Government evacuee property. The petitioner Board filed a revision before the Custodian General Punjab and after review of the entries and report came to the conclusion that the land was acquired evacuee property. Hence the revision was also dismissed. The petitioner moved the Financial Commissioner, Punjab and Secretary Rehabilitation Punjab Government under Section 54 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, who also dismissed the revision vide orders dated 13.5.1980 Annexure P.4 holding that the property was not wakf property and is an evacuee property and the petitioner was not in possession of the same. Rather Ganda Mal was the lessee of the Central Government. In the present writ petition, the challenge has been given to the orders Annexure P.2, P.3 and P.4 on the ground that these orders are illegal because till the year 1961-62, the property was shown to be kabristan Ahle Islam a