SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 1606

K.S.KUMARAN
S. K. Kapur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

K.S.Kumaran, J.

1. Second appellant Surinder Saini filed a complaint before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karnal, under Section 32 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940 against the petitioner herein alleging as follows :-

2. Complainant purchased an ampoule of injection Deca Somaboline .25 manufactured by the petitioner bearing the manufacturing date as June 1985 and expiry date as August, 1988 from Jagdamba Medical Hall, Karnal, vide cash memo No. 24493 dated 4.5.1988 for his own use as prescribed by the Doctor. Before using the drug the complaint doubted it to be adulterated drug/sub-standard drug as he found it contained some pieces of body of some small insect. In complainant wrote a letter dated 9.5.1988 to the petitioner. The complainant got the drug analysed from the Government Analyst Haryana State Laboratory, Chandigarh. The report of the Government Analyst dated 21.7.1988 reveals that the drug is not of standard quality as defined in the Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940 and the rules thereunder since the sample contained four pieces of body of some insect, like legs etc. such a drug cannot be used on a human being. The complaints sent a registered notice to the petitioner

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top