SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 1629

NARESH JAIN, IQBAL SINGH
Ranjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Beant Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Iqbal Singh, J.

1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been filed by appellant Ranjit Singh against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 6.5.1983 vide which the First Appeal preferred by the appellant against the judgment of Sub Judge 1st Class, Amritsar, dated 18.4.1974, in the suit for recovery of Rs. 40,000/- as compensation under the Fatal Accidents Act XIII of 1855 and under tort on account of loss of one eye, was accepted and suit of the plaintiff-appellant was decreed for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- along with interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum from the date of suit till payment thereof.

2. On 20.7.1968, the plaintiff-appellant Ranjit Singh was coming from his fields at about to 5/6 P.M. When he reached near the School, Beant Singh, Gurbax Singh, Randhir Singh and Harbans Singh waylaid him. Randhir Singh was armed with takua and Beant Singh, Gurbax Singh and Harbans Singh were armed with a dang each. Gurbax Singh thrusted his Dang on the right eye of Ranjit Singh appellant due to which his eye ball was badly damaged and it had to be ultimately removed. He was also caused six other injuries. The plaintiff-appellant, in the suit, claimed compensation of Rs. 40,000










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top