SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 1565

G.S.SINGHVI, B.RAI
R. K. Goel – Appellant
Versus
Haryana Urban Development Authority – Respondent


Judgment

G.S.Singhvi, J.

1. The petitioner who was allotted residential Plot No. 2154 in Sector 23, Sonepat vide allotment letter No. 10140 dated 24.8.1991 on the basis of the application submitted by him pursuant to the advertisement issued by the Haryana Urban Development Authority, Sonepat, has sought issue of a direction to the respondents to refund the amount of Rs. 80152/- along with interest at the rate of 24 per cent. He has also sought quashing of notice dated 1.3.1996 issued by the Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority, Sonepat.

2. The parties do not have any dispute in regard to the fact that the petitioner was allotted a plot measuring 209 sq. meters on the basis of application submitted by him in response to the advertisement issued by the respondents and that he deposited 25 per cent of the price as required by the advertisement and the letter of allotment. It is also not in dispute that he made payment of first and second instalments in favour of the respondent No. 2 and in this manner he deposited a sum of Rs. 80152/-. Notwithstanding this, the respondents have not given possession of the plot on the premise that the area in which the petitioner was all





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top