SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 1310

R.K.JAIN
Surinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
John Impex (Pvt ) Ltd – Respondent


Judgment

, J.

1. This order shall dispose of two criminal revisions Nos.195 and 197 of 1996, which involve common questions of law and facts.

2. Shri Surinder Singh, the petitioner in Cr. Revision No.195 of 1996 along with his mother Smt. Puna Devi, petitioner in Cr. Revision No.197 of 1996 and sister Smt. Satwant Kaur, is the owner of a house bearing No. A-56, Defence Colony, New Delhi. This property has been let out to respondent No.1. Respondent No.2 is the Managing director and respondent No.3 is the Director of respondent No.1, and are responsible for the business and affairs of respondent No.1-Company.

3. On 8.7.1995, respondent No.2 issued cheque for Rs.16.000/- drawn upon bank of India, Cannought Circus, New Delhi, in favour of the petitioner- Shri Surinder singh on account of rent of the said building. Similarly the said respondent issued a cheque dated 5.7.1995 for Rs.44,800/- drawn upon the same Bank in favour of Smt. Puna Devi on account of rent of the said building. Both these cheques were presented to Punjab and Sind Bank, Mohali, through Shri Rajinder Singh, holding General Power of Attorney on behalf of these petitioners. Both the cheque were dishonoured on account o













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top