SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 1241

K.S.KUMARAN
Bhan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

K.S.Kumaran, J.

1. Heard counsel.

On the basis of a complaint given by Gurdip Singh, second respondent herein, FIR No. 112, dated 29.4.1996, of Police Station City Barnala (Annexure P2) was registered. The main allegations in the complaint are as follows:

2. That the petitioner herein Bhan Singh and two other persons by name Jaswant Singh and Harbans Singh wanted to grab the land of Sham Kaur and with that intention Jaswant Singh and Harbans Singh filed Civil Suit No. 262 dated 2.6.89 against Sham Kaur in the Court of Sub Judge Ist Class Barnala. It is also alleged that they produced some other woman to impersonate Sham Kaur and got a statement recorded in their favour. According to the complainant, Bhan Singh, the petitioner herein knowingly identified the said impersonator as Sham Kaur and, thus, these persons had fraudulently got a consenting decree to be passed in favour of Jaswant Singh and Harbans Singh on 6.11.1989. According to the complainant, Sham Kaur never appeared in the Court nor filed any written statement nor gave any statement. It is not necessary for our purpose to go into the other allegations made in the complaint. Part played by the petitioner is stated






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top