SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 1124

AMARJEET CHAUDHARY
Om Parkash – Appellant
Versus
Rajbiri – Respondent


Judgment

Amarjeet Chaudhary, J.

1. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sonepat on a claim petition filed by the claimants under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, had fastened the liability to pay compensation of Rs. 96,000/-alongwith interest at the rate of 12% per annum on the owner and driver of offending truck No. HRS-889, on account of death of Krishan Pal in a road accident on 16.3.1990. The Insurance Company was absolved of its liability to pay compensation on the ground that there was no privity of contract between Jawahar Singh son of Ganesh Dass and the Insurance Company.

2. Aggrieved against the award, the owner and driver of the truck had filed the present appeal for setting aside the award of the Tribunal to the extent that the liability to pay compensation has been fastened on them.

3. There is no dispute regarding the factum of accident in any manner and the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants contends that the offending truck was duly insured with the Insurance Company and the premium was duly paid by the owner and as such the liability should have been fastened on the Insurance Company but the Tribunal has wrongly fastened







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top