G.S.SINGHVI
Samitri Devi – Appellant
Versus
Karam Singh – Respondent
G.S.Singhvi, J.
1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 24.5.1984 passed by the Appellate Authority, Jalandhar, the petitioner has filed this revision petition under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 with a prayer that the judgment of the Appellate Authority be set aside and the order passed by the Rent Controller, Jalandhar, on 17.11.1982 be restored.
2. The petitioner filed an ejectment petition against the respondent under Section 13 of 1949 Act on the ground of non-payment of rent since 1978 and also on the ground of making alteration in the tenanted property. The respondent contested the application on the ground of want of notice, mala fide intention of the petitioner and also on the ground that no material alteration had been made by him over the property in dispute. The petitioner examined Sukhwinder Singh, Naresh Kumar, Satnam Singh, B.N. Nanda and Parduman Kumar to prove her claim whereas the respondent appeared himself and examined Balwant Singh and Changa Singh in support of his case.
3. On the issue of non-payment of rent the Rent Controller held that the amount of rent had been tendered by the tenant along with interest and costs and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.