SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 1069

G.S.SINGHVI
Samitri Devi – Appellant
Versus
Karam Singh – Respondent


Judgment

G.S.Singhvi, J.

1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 24.5.1984 passed by the Appellate Authority, Jalandhar, the petitioner has filed this revision petition under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 with a prayer that the judgment of the Appellate Authority be set aside and the order passed by the Rent Controller, Jalandhar, on 17.11.1982 be restored.

2. The petitioner filed an ejectment petition against the respondent under Section 13 of 1949 Act on the ground of non-payment of rent since 1978 and also on the ground of making alteration in the tenanted property. The respondent contested the application on the ground of want of notice, mala fide intention of the petitioner and also on the ground that no material alteration had been made by him over the property in dispute. The petitioner examined Sukhwinder Singh, Naresh Kumar, Satnam Singh, B.N. Nanda and Parduman Kumar to prove her claim whereas the respondent appeared himself and examined Balwant Singh and Changa Singh in support of his case.

3. On the issue of non-payment of rent the Rent Controller held that the amount of rent had been tendered by the tenant along with interest and costs and





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top