SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 1051

B.RAI
Jaswant Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

B.Rai, J.

1. In Sessions Case No. 86 of 1995, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jagadhri, after perusal of report under Section 173, Code of Criminal Procedure, statements of witnesses and medical report, found that a prima facie case under Sections 307/323, Indian Penal Code, read with Section 34, Indian Penal Code, was made out against the accused persons and ordered the framing of charge for the said offences vide his order dated February 2, 1996. Feeling aggrieved, the accused filed the present Revision Petition.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on the complaint of Baldev Singh, on April 8, 1994 at about 9 p.m., a meeting of the Gram Panchayat was convened in which respectables of the village participated. The complaint was to the effect that some boys of the village teased the womenfolk of the complainant. However, no decision could be taken on the said complaint and all the persons attending the Panchayat meeting dispersed. Mam Raj petitioner got enraged and remarked that he could not allow the brother of Baldev Singh to be Sarpanch of the village. Mam Raj also in another tone said that the complainant, i.e. the younger brother of the Sarpanch, be caught hold.




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top